Comma Chameleon

In the one camp are the defenders of the Oxford Comma. The other includes an unholy alliance of AP Style defenders, internet shorthanders that eschew almost any formality, and those lawyers who’s own use of the comma is erratic, at best.

So, recently a US court formalized the necessity of the Oxford comma in its verdict, to which I quipped back to an Oxford Comma supporting friend of mine this:

the win is absolutely contextual(;) considering the context of both comma usages(,) and the intent of the writers(,) and assumption of the readers(,) the actual verdict means very little(,) especially(,) in the truly legal end of things where the usage(,) and overall language is much more defined(,) in an area where linguists(,) and lawyers have never agreed(,) without accounting for plebeians(,) with whom neither agrees with(,) except(,) possibly out of convenience. Never mind(,) how lame it is for so-called linguists to rely on the courts who traditionally would err on the side of butchering language to preserve what the bench would call “average joe understanding.”

Advertisements

About thedoormouse

I am I. That’s all that i am. my little mousehole in cyberspace of fiction, recipes, sacrasm, op-ed on music, sports, and other notations both grand and tiny: https://thedmouse.wordpress.com/about-thedmouse/
This entry was posted in books, Entertainment, humor, Quick Quip, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s